Before Jean-François Champollion deciphered Egyptian hieroglyphics, a certain amount of very confused traditional knowledge about their meaning did exist. I only discovered this today when looking up a peculiar book, the Hieroglyphica of Horapollo, just digitized at the Vatican Libary. It is copied into the start of Vat.lat.3898 with the following fanciful creature:
Hieroglyphica professes to be a translation from an Egyptian original into Greek by a certain Philippus, and became immensely popular among humanists. Wikipedia states that modern Egyptology regards at least the first part as based on genuine late-antique knowledge of hieroglyphs, although confused, and with baroque symbolism and theological speculation.
This week, @DigiVatLib has been especially busy, posting two of the most beautiful manuscripts on Twitter before I could even get to this blog post. Here is the full list of 21 new items:
Hieroglyphica professes to be a translation from an Egyptian original into Greek by a certain Philippus, and became immensely popular among humanists. Wikipedia states that modern Egyptology regards at least the first part as based on genuine late-antique knowledge of hieroglyphs, although confused, and with baroque symbolism and theological speculation.
This week, @DigiVatLib has been especially busy, posting two of the most beautiful manuscripts on Twitter before I could even get to this blog post. Here is the full list of 21 new items:
- Ross.13,
- Vat.lat.2344,
- Vat.lat.2363, a 15th century compendium of three specialist legal dictionaries, or repertoria in alphabetical order. Fols 65ra-107vb contain Baldus, Margarita [on the Commentaria of Innocent IV]
- Vat.lat.2364,
- Vat.lat.3054,
- Vat.lat.3073,
- Vat.lat.3180, appears to contain an Aristotle commentary listed by Lohr. Also a three page tract on physiognomy for which eTK gives the incipit (Inter ceteras est illa quam te ...) but cannot identify the author:
Also with a fine stemma of Christ and the disciples: - Vat.lat.3533, Pliny's fatal visit to the vicinity of Mount Vesuvius during the eruption of A.D. 79. Illumination from Vat. lat. 3533 (late 15th Cent.) #LatestDigitizedManuscript— Digita Vaticana (@DigitaVaticana) September 20, 2018
Naturalis Historia by Plinius Maior 🌋 https://t.co/C75J6tGxkp pic.twitter.com/xUkMSU4Q92 - Vat.lat.3541,
- Vat.lat.3564,
- Vat.lat.3674,
- Vat.lat.3681,
- Vat.lat.3698 (Upgraded to HQ),
- Vat.lat.3720, Vat. lat. 3720: Messa per Clemente VII (1523-1534) - https://t.co/fxJSFJATOR#LatestDigitizedManuscripts pic.twitter.com/M5c7EvpfMj— Digita Vaticana (@DigitaVaticana) September 18, 2018
- Vat.lat.3722,
- Vat.lat.3734,
- Vat.lat.3787 (Upgraded to HQ),
- Vat.lat.3898 (Upgraded to HQ), a 15th-century manuscript thought to come from the library of Angelo Colocci. The first text is the Hieroglyphica of Horapollo, incipit: Quomodo seculum significant seculum significare volentes solem ... (above)
- Vat.lat.3901 (Upgraded to HQ),
- Vat.lat.3923 (Upgraded to HQ),
- Vat.lat.3952 (Upgraded to HQ),
No comments :
Post a Comment