Showing posts with label LateAntiquity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LateAntiquity. Show all posts

2018-11-05

Mind's Eye Has Been Published

When were family-tree diagrams invented? My new book, Mind's Eye: How One Ancient Latin Invented Our Way to Visualize Stories, uncovers the progenitor of today's graphic timelines and trees in an ancient three-meter-wide chart of history.

Hidden in plain sight, the Great Stemma -- a Roman masterpiece -- has never been honored at book length before.

The Great Stemma was not only a vast visual abstraction of the march of time from Creation as far as the birth of Jesus Christ, but also marked a swerve in civilization towards exploiting our visual perception as an extra tool for thinking.

I argue that diagrams and visual displays exploit the computing power of human vision to short-cut our reasoning tasks. Cognitive science is only now able to grasp what a major shift in human culture this was. My research places that creative leap in the ancient world.

I foreshadowed Mind's Eye two years ago (when the book's working title was "Expositor" and I was still following up some loose ends in the inquiry). Since then, I have added some great cover art (the theme comes from Neptune's Necklace, a wondrous seaweed from the South Pacific) and converted the manuscript to e-book format. A print version may follow.

Here's the link which leads to stores where you can buy Mind's Eye at a low introductory price: https://books2read.com/PigginMindsEye (to which I add a modest plea: buy from one of the non-Kindle stores, where the price to you is the same, but I get a bigger royalty!)

Mind's Eye can be read rapidly, by skimming the 117 illustrations and checking out the QR links. Or it can be savored as an 88,000-word narrative in which I narrate how I brought this neglected graphic to light.

2018-09-18

Drawing the Madaba Map

The Madaba Mosaic Map in Jordan has never, to my knowledge, been reproduced and published to modern scholarly standards, frustrating my efforts to include it in the Library of Latin Diagrams.

The first photographs, by Eugène Germer-Durand, appeared in 1897 in a thin book in Paris. The mosaic in color photographs appeared in Herbert Donner and Heinz Cüppers (1977), but the images are single, poorly lit and not coordinated.

It ought to be possible to sythnesize one composite, high-contrast, high-resolution photograph of the whole artefact in the Church of St George in Madaba (a single exposure of the entire map is impossible to take, since the mosaic flows on all four sides around a pillar).

However a photograph does not allow a diachronic approach where we can contemplate the object at different times. Parts of the mosaic have disappeared in the past century.

What is required is a highly zoomable technical drawing as a base for annotation.

Astonishingly, scholarship continues to mostly depend on a colored drawing made of the mosaic at the turn of the century by Paul Palmer, a Jerusalem architect. That drawing is employed in the still-current edition of the map by the late Mikael Avi-Yonah of 1953. At my prompting, a major library earlier this year brought the first printed book with the drawing online (see my post), but I soon realized it is neither practical nor economical to digitize the Palmer drawing at fine resolution. What other drawings exist?

As far as I know, most of the drawings date from the early years. Some 20 years ago, Yiannis Meimaris of the National Hellenic Research Foundation surveyed some of them.

The first drawing, on graph paper, was that by Cleopas Koikylides, a scholar but not an archaeologist, of 1896 December 13.  This was published 1897 March 8 in his pamphlet printed by the Franciscan Fathers and is reproduced in the volume by Donner/Cüppers, but it is too crude to be useful.

The next drawing was done by Geōrgios Arvanitakis, variously described as the Greek Orthodox patriarchal astronomer or professor of the Holy Cross School of Theology in Jerusalem, who did a more thorough version at Madaba 1897 January 9-23. Meimaris describes this as a precise copy in 12 sheets on a scale of 1/5. The same copy included an 0.80 x 0.60 m plan of the church, showing the position of the mosaic in it, but excluded the two fragments which were separated from the main part of the map and located to the north of it.

Arvanitakis tried to wring the maximum money value from his work. He photographed his own drawings and offered reproductions for 100 golden franks. This seems to be the set of 10 photos mentioned by Peter Thomsen in the other major history of the drawing period. Arvanitakis also prevailed on the Franciscans help him in a bid to sell his original to French scholarly bodies (Meimaris quotes Clermont-Ganneau PEFQSt 1897:213-214 and I have also found a report about this in Belles-Lettres). Hopping promptly on a ship to Istanbul, he gave lectures about the map. The newspaper Neologos Konstantinoupoleos reported these seances in March.

Donner/Cüppers prints a rough drawing of 1897 attributed to Enrico Stevenson and published with an article, "Nuove scoperte a Madaba nella Palestina" (NBAC 3, 325).

In 1898 a patriarchal letter of authority was issued to Mr. Salim (K)ari. From a copy of the map in the possession of the  Palestine Exploration Fund, on which is written that "it was bought from Selim el-Kary who said he copied it direct from the mosaic". I have not seen this image published anywhere.

In September 1901, the Orthodox Patriarchate seems to have engaged two German painters, F. Cornely and G. Hartmann, to paint a full-size copy on canvas of the mosaic. Thomsen wrote in 1929 that this was still hanging in the Greek School opposite the Greek Hospital. Meimaris says it was then lost for several decades and it "was found only recently (in November 1996) by me in the Patriarchate, torn into two pieces and in extremely bad condition. This copy deserves to be restored, since it is the only life-size colour reproduction of the original map." No more has been heard of it.

Palmer, who had been given authority by the Greek patriarch February 20,1897 to examine the map, may not have done a precise copy at first. Wilhelm Kubitschek, in a Vienna lecture on January 7, 1898, quotes from the newsletter, the Mittheilungen, of the Deutscher Verein zur Erforschung Palästinas (DVEP) dated April 18, 1897, stating that scaffolding was erecting the church for photographs to be taken for Palmer, but that the images turned out to be unusable.

"Die beiden genannten Herren (Palmer and Hermann Guthe from Berlin) sind nun damit beschäftigt, eine in Farben ausgeführte Zeichnung der Karte herzustellen," he added. Kubitschek's grumbling was justified.  It was not until April 1904 (according to Thomsen) that Guthe, who was to write the accompanying text, arrived in Jerusalem to inspect his accuracy.

What happened next is unclear. By Palmer's own account, he teamed up four years later with Cornely and Hartmann, but there remains a certain suspicion that he may have saved himself trouble by copying their image, at least in part. Thomsen conversely implies that the two copied from Palmer: Die weitgehende Übereinstimmung mit den Tafeln von Palmer erklärt sich daraus, daß die beiden Maler mit ihm zusammen gearbeitet haben. 

This colored drawing was finally published in ten lithographs in 1906 and presumably owes something to Cornely and Hartmann, whose first names I have not been able to discover. They are real enough people though, gaining parallel mention by Josef Strzygowski and P. J. Dashian in connection with a mosaic of Orpheus in ZDPV (1901) and by Metaxakis in Nea Sion (1906, 156). Thomsen notes several points where Palmer's accuracy is wanting:
Bei Palmer sind die Farben viel zu lebhaft für das im allgemeinen matt gehaltene Original. Die Linien der einzelnen Steinchen sind zu regelmäßig gezogen. Spätere Ausbesserungen und Schäden sind nicht erkennbar. Das Versehen an den drei Toren der Grabeskirche (gleichhoch und oben gerundet) ist in der endgültigen Ausgabe berichtigt.
Our immediate need now is for a crisp drawing which covers every detail of the mosaic, but is not overly complex. For that I intend to turn elsewhere, to a line drawing published by Adolf Jacoby in 1905. It is a simple tracing of the photographs in the Germer-Durand book by an amateur in Strasbourg, Leutnant Brix.

Jacoby does not give Brix's first name but says he had been an army munitions disposal officer, presumably Prussian. Brix probably never saw the mosaic in color let alone travelled to Madaba, but his evident training in technical drawing from black and white photographs and patient tracing at least gives us a place to start creating a scalable vector graphics image which can be modified as we go along.

Avî-Yônā, Mîḵā’ēl. The Madaba Mosaic Map: With Introduction and Commentary. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1954.

Donner, Herbert, and Heinz Cüppers. Die Mosaikkarte von Madeba: Tafelband. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 1977.

Germer-Durand, Eugène. La Carte Mosaïque de Madaba: Découverte Importante, 1897. Paris: Maison de la bonne presse, 1897.

Jacoby, Adolf. Das Geographische Mosaik von Madaba: Die Älteste Karte des Heiligen Landes ; Ein Beitrag zu ihrer Erklärung. Studien über Christliche Denkmäler 3. Leipzig: Dieterich, 1905.
Kubitschek, Wilhelm. “Die Mosaikkarte Palästinas.” Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft 43 (1900): 335–80. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/coo.31924094297904.

Meimaris, Yiannis. “The Discovery of the Madaba Mosaic Map. Mythology and Reality.” In The Madaba Map Centenary, 1897-1997: Travelling through the Byzantine Umayyad Period; Proceedings of the International Conference Held in Amman, 7-9 April 1997, edited by Michele Piccirillo. Publications of the Studium Biblicum Franciscanum [Collectio Maior] 40. Jerusalem: Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, 1999. https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.christusrex.org:80/www1/ofm/mad/articles//*.

Palmer, Paul, Hermann Guthe, and Deutscher Verein zur Erforschung Palästinas. Die Mosaikkarte von Madeba. Leipzig, Baedeker, 1906. http://archive.org/details/diemosaikkartevo00deut.
Thomsen, Peter. “Das Stadtbild Jerusalems auf der Mosaikkarte von Madeba.” Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins 52, no. 2 (1929): 149–74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27929765.

2018-09-17

Royal Gift

It may rate as the grandest facsimile atlas of all time: the Monumenta Cartographica Africae et Egyptiae of Prince Youssouf Kamal of Egypt. Sixteen volumes of reproductions of old maps and texts concerned with historical geography, in a limited edition of 100 deposited in the great libraries.

There's some good news. A few weeks ago, the National Library of Spain's digitization program scanned three of its fascicles as the bound volumes are designated. You can now turn some of the pages of this fascinating book from home, a privilege previously only open to the royalty who got suchlike as gifts, or billionaires who could bribe their way to interloan it :-).

The links are below. Why the BNE is omitting parts of the series (perhaps it does not own them?) is unclear. I introduced Prince Kamal's unique research and publishing project in a post in May where his motivations are considered. Certainly nothing of its kind will ever be attempted in print again, since today digital is far easier.

The 16 fascicles by number, highlights indicate the three online:
1    ; Époque avant Ptolémée (pp 1-107)
2,1 ; Ptolémée et époque Gréco-Romano
2,2 ; Ptolémée et époque Gréco-Romano
2,3 ; Ptolémée et époque Gréco-Romano (pp 362-480)
2,4 ; Atlas antiquus et index
3,1 ; Époque arabe (pp 482-583)
3,2 ; Époque arabe
3,3 ; Époque arabe
3,4 ; Époque arabe
3,5 : Title? pp 946-1072
4,1 ; Époque des portulans, suivie par l'époque des découvertes
4,2 ; Époque des portulans, suivie par l'époque des découvertes
4,3 ; Époque des portulans, suivie par l'époque des découvertes
4,4 ; Époque des portulans, suivie par l'époque des découvertes
5,1 ; Additamenta : Naissance et évolution de la cartographie moderne
5,2 ; Additamenta : Naissance et évolution de la cartographie moderne

2018-08-01

New Edition of the Tabula Peutingeriana

The Tabula Peutingeriana is a UNESCO Memory of the World treasure which is the nearest thing to a Roman road-map still in existence.  Today I have relaunched the Tabula Peutingeriana Animated Edition with some major improvements to help both scholars and the general public understand this priceless roll now kept in a Vienna vault.

The biggest improvement to my digital reproduction at piggin.net/ta.svg will be visible when you start hovering a cursor or holding a finger on the yellow boxes which mark the mutations. In many cases, the lines now move incrementally so that you can compare the before and after states.

I hope readers will begin to perceive the Tabula more sympathetically, realizing that is is damaged rather than hopelessly old and wrong. Despite its idiosyncrasies, there is a more rationality to it than meets the eye.

The animations were technically complex to build with SMIL coding, but I decided the effort was worth it, because it can sometimes be quite difficult to spot the differences when simply flipping between two static views. On a slow computer you may find it takes a while for each of the animations to kick off, so it is prudent to hover in and out a couple of times to make sure you have seen all the steps. In Microsoft's Edge and Explorer browsers they do not seem to work at all. Use another browser.

The second big improvement here is the addition of a new database of annotations to the 62 emendations so far. I have launched this in the form of a blog, Restoring the Tabula Peutingeriana, to make it as easy as possible for readers to comment directly on every note. There has never been any central forum for these issues and I would be very glad if scholars would come here if they need, on the fly, to discuss the cases.

Other improvements include an extension of the chart's colored and emended area to Asia Minor as far as Samsat and a new link policy whereby all my charts will have very short, easily noted URLs such as piggin.net/ta.svg to make it easier to cite them. ta stands for Tabula Animated.

2018-05-07

This Oldest Map is a Beauty

The oldest surviving Latin diagram of the world was rediscovered by accident in the Vatican Library in the 1920s. Youssouf Kamal (1882-1965), an Egyptian prince and aesthete, had financed a huge undertaking to publish a collection of ancient maps depicting Africa fully or obliquely. While combing through the Vatican, the scholars stumbled on a lavish, full-page colored spread, folios 64v-65r in Vat.lat.6018, which had been completely overlooked in all previous historical research.

A few weeks ago I digitally plotted a simpler diagram of similar age which is now held by the archives of Albi, France and has been recognized as a UNESCO world heritage treasure. The Vatican Mappamundi was drawn in about 760 or 770 CE and has been a good deal more difficult to plot, since the photographic images compress the central part into the gutter of the book binding.


This is the first-ever color plot to be published. Zoom in and you will see that the diagram has south at the top and therefore Europe at bottom right. The scribe evidently turned the parchment as he worked and wrote place names from every side.

Six cities are represented by star-shaped symbols: Constantinople, Rome, Alexandria, Carthage, Jerusalem and Babylon. The big island at left is Sri Lanka and at lower right are the British Isles. The meaning of the "fourth continent" at top right has been much debated. The crescenty things on the rim are thought to represent sun and moon.

The current received wisdom is that this is a Christian adaptation of a diagram which had been used to teach (secular) geographical knowledge in late antique schools in the Latin West. The Vatican Mappamundi is probably contemporary with the original of the 12th-century Tabula Peutingeriana, a Latin diagram in roll form which shows the whole known world as a very long strip. My view is that abstract diagrams (of which both are fine examples) are an invention of late antiquity, not earlier.

For this digital plot I used the Vatican Library's scans, uncurling the center part with the lattice deformation tool in Inkscape. The transcriptions are mostly Francois Glorie's, while a black and white engraving by Menéndez Pidal helped decode some of the ambiguities. The color adaptation is my own. The SVG file will soon appear in my Library of Latin Diagrams where you will be able to read it with a tablet computer and rotate it to your heart's content.

Now, back to the discoverer. Prince Youssouf belonged to a dynasty of Albanian origin who ruled Egypt until the army-led revolution of 1952. Through polygamy it was a large family and Youssouf held back from the jostling for leadership, instead founding seats of learning and cultivating the arts. Such was his wealth that he built three palaces and financed culture.

He seems to have been interested in two major topics: the depiction of North Africa in ancient cartography and the contributions of Islamic learning to cartography. That is why he financed the Monumenta cartographica Africae et Aegypti, a catalogue of facsimile images of manuscript maps.

He is listed as author, but the research and compilation was done by Frederik Caspar Wieder (1874-1943) of the Netherlands. Only 100 copies of the 16-part series published in Cairo between 1926 and 1951 were ever printed, with a few sold to collectors and most given away to libraries and institutions. It was never digitized, meaning it is a very hard-to-access resource.

Chekin, L. S. (1999). Easter tables and the Pseudo-Isidorean Vatican map. Imago Mundi, 51(1), 13–23. DOI 10.1080/03085699908592900.
Edson, E. (1998). Mapping Time and Space: How Medieval Mapmakers Viewed Their World. London: British Library.
Englisch, B. (2002). Ordo Orbis Terrae: Die Weltsicht in den Mappae mundi des frühen und hohen Mittelalters. Akademie Verlag.
Glorie, F. (1965). Mappa Mvndi (Vat. lat. 6108). In P. Geyer, O. Cuntz, A. Francheschini, R. Weber, L. Bieler, J. Fraipont, & F. Glorie (Eds.), Itineraria et alia geographica (pp. 456–466). Brepols.
Menéndez Pidal, G. (1954). Mozárabes y asturianos en la cultura de la Alta Edad Media, en relación especial con la Historia de los conocimientos geográficos. Boletín de La Real Academia de La Historia, 134, 137–292.
Uhden, R. (1935). Die Weltkarte des Isidorus von Sevilla. Mnemosyne, 3rd series, 3, 1–28

2017-10-27

Squeezing Secrets from the Peutinger Diagram

Do all roads lead to Rome? Not with the Peutinger Diagram. In neither sense of the phrase.

In Africa as depicted on this extraordinary late antique geographical chart (see Talbert's digital version), the roads do not even point toward Rome. They run from east to west, ending at dusty forts on the desert's edge. I simplified their layout to a system diagram (below), showing how the chart-maker emphasized an array of parallel routes and inserted only occasional connections between these main lines.

By contrast, in Italy, nearly all the highways lead to (or depart from) Rome. That appears to have been a guiding inspiration when the chart-maker was laying out the routes from the Alps to the gates of Rome. But as will see from my latest system diagram, this one for Italy (it has just gone online), there are some important exceptions.

To make these system diagrams, I squeeze the Tabula like a concertina. The Tabula (surviving in a single manuscript, Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Codex Vindobonensis 324) is a very long roll, to be read in the horizontal. Eliminating that longness and adding some height enables us to see the network structure at a glance and comb apart the manuscript's jagged thickets of connections.

The limit of my squeezing is always the point where the slightly sloping lines in the original rear up to an angle of 45 degrees from the horizontal, since the most useful outcome is a spider diagram that resembles the London Underground network diagram. The horizontal scale is thus reduced and the crooked lines are regularized into a grid, but no other re-arranging is permissible.

One use of this assay procedure is to test how proportionate to the geographical landform the Tabula is. One can put the peninsula's outline on screen (anchored to Milan: press the radio button next to "landmass" to "on") and see that at one-fifth the width, the match is surprisingly good.

The grey shape you can see here is a silhouette of the coast which has been given a one-eighth turn so that the peninsula aligns horizontally. Look for the spur, heel and instep of Italy (the toe is out of sight). In the image above, you'll note that Naples (Neapoli) has been pushed too far downwards, and Rome and Benevento are placed too far to the right, but all in all, this mapping is closer to the real thing than the Underground diagram is to the real London.

I began with a proverb, all roads lead to Rome, which signifies that a variety of methods produce the same result. That is of course untrue in information visualization, where two different renderings of the same data - a scale map and a network diagram - often produce a very different impression on us.

The purpose of reflowing the Tabula in this fashion is to reveal some of its subtler graphic characteristics, which tend to escape notice when we stare at the roll-form original. The great Theodor Mommsen did something similar in 1851 before he became Germany's most famous professor. In his paper, ‘Die Unteritalien betreffenden Abschnitte der ravennatischen Kosmographie’, he rectified the Tabula layout much as I have done. (The job must have caused extreme stress to the printer.)

My systemic view is both more useful (with overlays and links) and more rigorous. You will notice in my analysis is that I have classified the roads into major (colored) routes with many stops (which I would argue derive from the original Tabula) and minor (black) cross-country routes with few stops, which are much more likely to be casual additions to the chart by later readers.

Reflowing will make features you have overlooked pop out visually. It may also reveal if you have misconceptions about the data. My first attempt at this stratification did expose a misconception. This concerned three land routes in southern Italy. The original Tabula shows Roma - Corfinio, Nares Lvcanas - Vibona Balentia (both olive green) and Erdonia - Gnatie (dark blue) as sinuous, fragmented, error-ridden routes. I mistook these for write-ins by a later user or editor.

The compressed version shows that if these routes are straightened out, they fit snugly enough into the available space. The road to Corfinio is a fairly important path across the Apennines, while the Nares - Vibona and Erdonia - Gnatie connections run parallel to (and quite close to) their respective coasts.

Of the remaining thin black lines, some represent now indeterminate sub-networks, such as near Hostilia, where the Tabula's original layout has been lost, or one or two borderline cases, such as a detour through Todo (Tvder), which may have been part of the first layout. But for the rest, I would argue they are no more than ancillary mark-up, not part of the primitive design.

I have already hinted at a related discovery: compared to the Mezzogiorno, a disproportionately greater width of the Tabula has been allocated to the parallel tracks from the Alps to Rome. Perhaps the chart-maker started at the left and ran out of room, but whatever the reason, the Mezzogiorno ended up being a crowded part of the chart where the three connections above had to be folded up to fit.

That in turn is a main reason why I could not compact the Tabula's southern Italy by a factor of more than 5, whereas it was feasible to compress the Tabula's Africa by a factor of 20. Compressing is done by opening an image of the Tabula in the Inkscape graphics program and using its Transform > Scale command to reduce the drawing to a stated percentage of its original width. Attempting to take Italia below 20 per cent caused some of the gently inclined paths to go nearly vertical.

The disproportion between the two parts of Italy may disprove one of my earlier arguments too. In a draft article, I pointed out this year that across the Tabula's thin, river-like Adriatic, southern Italian cities are shown opposite Dalmatian coast cities that are almost due north of them.

The red lines in this sketch show these matches. From northern Italy, the one match shown involves the shortest line to the closest point, whereas five cities of southern Italy are not matched to the closest towns opposite. Knowing that the Mezzogiorno has been pushed into a space on the Tabula that is not big enough for it, we can guess this (rather than the African point of view) may explain the poor correspondences.

The Dutch scholar B. H. Stolte (see my missing manual) proposed nearly 70 years ago that the original Tabula was originally drawn scaled to one quarter of its present width. I am not entirely convinced by his argument, let alone his supposition that this applies to the whole chart, not just parts of it, although my system diagram demonstrates that compression is a possibility. I think it is simpler to assume that the chart-maker instinctively laid out most of his Italia lines either horizontally or at an incline of about 11 degrees, which would suffice to account for the neat, 45-degree compass rose of alignments when we compress the Italia zone of the chart.

We know now that the Tabula is not a "map" of the Roman Empire's road system. It leaves out too many major roads to merit that description. Its over-selects roads that run lengthwise on the roll and neglects the oblique ones.

I imagine the chart-maker planning his design with ostraca - old scraps of pottery or writing material - writing names on each from the itinerary texts and laying his scraps out in lines across the ground, a hypothesis I have already applied to the genesis of Great Stemma history diagram of antiquity.

Adopting the same approach as he had employed in Africa, the chart-maker drew the routes of northern Italia as parallel tracks (and indeed ignored all routes that were not longitudinal). These are the five or six main strands north (to the left) of Rome. These parallel routes shift and join like channels in an estuary, but the parallel reticulate pattern, as I call it, prevails. The Great North Road, the wine-red route from Rome via Fano and Bononia (Bologna), necessarily has kinks, since it crosses from Rome to the Adriatic coast, then turn north-west.

The routes in the Mezzogiorno turned out to be less parallel and more reticulate than in the north of Italy. In my spider diagram, the shore roads and the road parallel to each in the hinterland are easy to see, but it is the cross-peninsular routes that now catch the eye.

Two of these cross routes (purple and red) lead northeastwards from the port of Salerno to the "spur" of Italy, ending at Pescara (Ostia Eterni) and Siponto. These are not roads to Rome, but roads to use when avoiding Rome. If my hypothesis that the Tabula was drawn in Africa is correct, these would instruct any travelers from Africa heading over to the Adriatic coast.

There's another enhancement to my spider diagram which researchers may find useful. We only possess a single manuscript of the Tabula, but we possess a text that is half useful: the so-called Anonymous Cosmographer of Ravenna wrote a dreary listing of world place-names, probably in the 8th century, in which large sections match the name series in the Tabula.

The Cosmographia, which is the topic of Mommsen's paper already mentioned, does not directly help us to reconstruct the primitive version of the Tabula, which dates from five centuries earlier. But it does flag possible omissions or alterations in the Vienna manuscript. Because of its usefulness, I am offering an overlay where a brown line traces on the Tabula the places the Cosmographia mentions.

To make this useful to future researchers, I have marked the missing names with white circles. If you haven't found them yet, there are three controls in the top left corner of my system diagram (link again) which show and hide the layers: the spider layout, the outline of Italy, and the Cosmographia order. You simply need to click or tap the radio button controls. Try not to display more than one at once.

And where does "All roads lead to Rome" come from? The librarians at Notre Dame say:
The proverb "All roads lead to Rome" derives from medieval Latin. It was first recorded in writing in 1175 by Alain de Lille, a French theologian and poet, whose Liber Parabolarum renders it as 'mille viae ducunt homines per saecula Romam' (a thousand roads lead men forever to Rome). The first documented English use of the proverb occurs more than two hundred years later, in Geoffrey Chaucer's Astrolabe of 1391, where it appears as 'right as diverse pathes leden diverse folk the righte way to Rome.'

Mommsen, Theodor. ‘Die Unteritalien betreffenden Abschnitte der ravennatischen Kosmographie’. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaft zu Leipzig, Philologisch-Historische Klasse 3 (1851): 80–117.

2017-09-07

Fresh Life for Roman Map

The most famous map in the world is the Tabula Peutingeriana, a Roman chart of roads and seas. In 2007, UNESCO placed it on its Memory of the World Register, a global list of 301 documents (as of 2013) which are irreplaceable to comprehend our recent and distant past.

The 12th-century sole copy of the chart is locked in a library vault in Vienna, Austria. So the only decent access you'll get is either to look up a high-resolution photograph (see Richard Talbert's Map Viewer) or check out the the first fully digital edition. The latter, which is my work, arrived online today, and it's #free.

With the digital edition, your browser can:
  • search for any of the 3,000+ names (press Ctrl + F)
  • use live links (signaled by a hand cursor) to get more info
  • zoom in (press Ctrl and mouse wheel) without loss of quality
  • reveal manuscript errors (hover cursor over yellow boxes)
Back in March I foreshadowed this edition, which has been the work of several months and is based on the phenomenal earlier work of Talbert and Tom Elliott (@paregorios). The credits line says:
  • Richard Talbert and Tom Elliott (transcription, projection, colors, original typology); 
  • Jean-Baptiste Piggin (replot, object modelling, interpretational overlayers, revised typology).
The live links lead to the interpretative database which Richard Talbert very generously placed online as a free resource several years ago. The colors of the lettering and roads are not medieval or ancient, but my own choice to make the document more accessible. Other alterations to give it fresh life include reducing spaced-out lettering to make it easily legible. For the sake of a compact file and fast loading I am not reproducing the little vignettes that show towns, temples and spas.

Here is the link to the Piggin Peutinger Diagram and here is the table of contents for my site. Download your own copy to preserve this astonishing artifact of the fourth-century Roman Empire.

Other online Tabula Peutingeriana resources you can consult are:

2017-05-09

Moovel Mash-up

A little over a year ago, the remarkable Roads to Rome map of Europe was published by researchers at Germany-based Moovel Labs. It's an algorithm-generated grey-and-white diagram which assembles the shortest land routes from every point in Europe (including Turkey and European Russia) to Rome.
The map (which you can zoom into and explore on an interactive viewer) won global interest because of its dendritic simplicity. It has a soothing balance about it, calling to mind blood vessels in a living organism or the veins in an outlandishly shaped leaf. And yet it is quite packed with data. You can see at a glance where any two Europeans' paths will meet up if they both set out for Rome.

Somewhere, either on your local roads, or speeding long-distance towards Italy by motorway, your two ways will merge, and the fat trunk lines mark the routes where the great throng will pour towards Rome's Seven Hills.

It turned out I was not alone in wondering if this was somehow long ago foreshadowed by the Tabula Peutingeriana, a 12th-century parchment copy of a late-antique visualization of travel itineraries of the Roman and Persian worlds where Rome is depicted as the very middle of a spider-like web.

Moovel Labs' spokesman told me others had mused about this too. It seems however I was the only person who took that question so seriously as to eventually overlay Moovel's Roads-to-Rome data on the Peutinger with a view to publishing the outcome.

The principal obstacle, it turned out, was a practical one: no compact, high-resolution digital surrogate of the Peutinger Diagram yet existed. The current standard mapping, Richard Talbert's Peutinger Map A, was only available in a server-side viewer.

The work to create a better surrogate was detailed in an earlier blog post. I have now marked by hand on this surrogate the roads picked out by the Moovel algorithm. This overlay is a 370-KB SVG file that should open in most browsers. The trunk route northwards out of Rome to Florence has been widened to 28 pixels and there is a descending hierarchy of ramifying routes down to the smallest breadth, 2 pixels, where you can clearly see each Peutinger chicane, or zigzag marking a rest stop.

None of the beauty of the Moovel diagram carries over to the elongated Peutinger layout, which looks like nothing so much as a tangle of utility cables in a muddy trench. The adaptation is in no way limpid, which underlines how the design of any diagram is not a neutral thing, but closely bound to its purpose. The Peutinger designer had very different intentions from the Moovel team's purpose.

Despite this, three informative conclusions can be drawn from the exercise.

First of all, the Peutinger Diagram ostentatiously shows 12 roads that terminate at Rome, but this spider's-web presentation is a conceit. Most of these roads peter out in central Italy. The Moovel map emphasizes just one northbound (leftwards) and one southbound (rightwards) route, and a moment of reflection recalls to us that even mighty Rome itself is really no more than a stop along a peninsular trunk road.

Secondly, there may be no motorways on the Peutinger Diagram, but roads then and now follow the same lie of the land and connect the same main population centres, so many of the ancient routes live on as multi-lane highways and can be easily found among the Moovel trunk and branches. However many lesser shortcuts and even some main ancient roads were evidently unknown to the Peutinger designer.

A road north from Florence over the Apennines to Bologna seems from Pelagios to have existed then, and is followed today by Italy's trunk autostrada, yet the Peutinger designer simply ignores its existence as an irrelevance. Throughout the pre-medieval era, northbound travellers from Rome mostly preferred another, longer route, the Via Flaminia, then the Via Aemilia, as Tønnes Bekker-Nielsen very accessibly explained some years ago.

All these missing routes are denoted in my mash-up by dotted lines. Also missing is the route from Bologna to the Venice shore (Altino) and on to Aquileia.

The Moovel map guides traffic through the claustrophobic Fréjus, Mont Blanc and St Gotthard road tunnels under the Alps, ignoring old busy routes like the Via Francigena. Back in the day, the traveller had to huff and puff through the thin air of the Montgenèvre, Little St Bernard, Great St Bernard and Spluegen Passes over the Alps (named in the Peutinger "In Alpe Cottia," "In Alpe Graia," "In Summo Pennino" and "Cunuaureu": see René Voorburg's magnificent Omnes Viae to find these). Only the Brenner Pass crossing shown on the Peutinger Diagram remains a main road today.

Thirdly, the Peutinger Diagram is entirely unknowing about northern Europe. Three of the Moovel's fat trunk routes to the far north thus fall off the top edge of the Peutinger Diagram, which finishes at the Netherlands and southern Germany and has no cognizance of the Baltic countries or Russia. However latitudinally, the scope of these two diagrams is very similar, stretching from Britain to eastern Turkey.

Overlaying the Moovel data on the Peutinger emphasizes how cramped (and unmaplike) the late antique project is. Where the roads fan out on the Moovel chart, the Peutinger Diagram crams them together like stiff fingers on an arthritic hand, in effect classifying the routes into regional blocks as sets of local itineraries.

My experiments with the Peutinger Diagram will continue. Don't forget to check my project page on ResearchGate to monitor progress. Collaborators and followers are very welcome to announce themselves.

Bekker-Nielsen, Tønnes. ‘Terra Incognita: The Subjective Geography of the Roman Empire’. In Studies in Ancient History and Numismatics: Eds Aksel Amsgaard-Madsen, Erik Christiansen and Erik Hallager, 148–61. Aarhus: Aarhus UP, 1988. Online.
Talbert, Richard J. A. Rome’s World: The Peutinger Map Reconsidered. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010.

2017-03-20

Did Classical Rome Invent the Scala Diagram?

Some weeks ago, this blog reported the first appearance online of a major legal-history manuscript in Rome, the Tractatus Vaticanus or Vat.lat.1352. At that time the images of it were only offered in black and white, and at poor resolution. Now this fine old codex is available in color and at excellent resolution as the work of digitization proceeds.

The core material in this book is the so-called Quadripartitus, a monument of Carolingian canon law, which is a guide to penances at confession that is not in itself rare. In all, 11 manuscripts survive (this one is siglum Y, see Wikipedia and Rob Meens for a survey of these manuscripts). Its organization is as follows: Fols 12 - 84r: Paenitentiale. Fols 84v - 97r: more sections "ex panitentiali romano," "ex penitentiali theodori" etc, including several excerpta patrum (see Oberleitner, Augustinus, 1970).

Its particular interest however lies in its occasional excerpta (quotations) from lawyers and church fathers, some unique, about jurisprudence. The page of greatest interest is fol. 62r which shows a very early arbor juris diagram:

Readers of the earlier blog post, may recall that the text beneath the diagram refers to it as both an arbor and as a scala. This diagram is canonical to a key topic in Roman private law: inheritance. It explains which relations are entitled and in which order when someone dies intestate and leaving property.

A case can be made that arbor is the medieval term whereas scala is the older Latin technical term for this monument in the history of visualization. In the classification of these diagrams by Hermann Schadt (see my Missing Manual), this form belongs to the Typ 1 class.

Schadt argued that such diagrams may not just have been devised in late antiquity, but that they could indeed have already existed in the classical Roman period. Since Schadt's important book in German,  Die Darstellungen der Arbores Consanguinitatis und der Arbores Affinitatis: Bildschemata in juristischen Handschriften (Tübingen: Wasmuth, 1982) is not easily accessible to most readers, I will set out his case in summary here.

Schadt’s first argument is one of usage. It is hardly plausible to suppose that the emperor Justinian’s Institutions, a foundational law textbook issued in 533 CE, introduced this diagram type to legal scholarship for the first time, since the Institutions are based on previous textbooks and explain the degrees of relationship to the student without any especial introduction of the topic. Under the supervision of Tribonian, two law professors (Theophilus and Dorotheus) had been assigned to extract statements about the basic institutions ("Institutiones") of Roman law from the existing teaching books.

One infers from this procedure that visualization of the degrees by means of a diagram was not new, but already an established skill among law teachers. Schadt notes that Servius (4th century) quotes Varro (1st century) as having written on the topic of degrees, adding that another work on the topic is attributed to Ulpian (+277), though no diagram is mentioned by these. But the word degree is telling.

Schadt stresses that the Pauli Sententiae (about 400) alludes to a diagram of the arbor juris type.

At this point in the argument, he refers to Vat. lat.1352 and suggests that its medieval repetition of the word scala (ladder) may well be quoting some centuries-old legal tract. 

Schadt’s second argument is one of inertia: the arrangement of such a diagram would have been difficult to design and therefore it is likely to have been conserved unchanged once it entered wide use (and not to have been altered by Tribonian or any compiler).

His third argument is chronological, alluding to the antiquarian content of the oldest form of Typ 1 tables which have textual tags saying they represent the “lex hereditatis”, the law of succession prior to the Roman Republican period. Those diagrams contain only the adgnati, that is to say those relations under the potestas or manus of the head of the Roman household who comprised the sui heredes – both the younger family living at home including the wives (the uxor in manu, the nurus in manu, etc.) and the older relatives living elsewhere, the proximi adgnati, essentially the head of the household’s cousins, since the older generations are dead.

The diagrams thus sets out the legal bounds of family under the fifth-century-BCE Law of the Twelve Tables and gives no acknowledgement to the praetorian legislation of the Republican period, which widened the circle of entitled family to the cognate relatives. (It should be noted however that cognates were only entitled to bonorum possessio, not to full title in intestate property, and that they therefore had only secondary status to those who claimed under the civil-law provisions.)

In addition, this table does not affirm the right of a child to inherit from an intestate mother, which was introduced by the Senatus Consultum Tertullianum under Hadrian (117-138). The ego’s sister is also missing from the diagram, though Gaius 2.85 states that she was considered agnate in his day.

Schadt's fourth argument is linguistic: some of the terminology (patruus maior and maximus) is antiquated and would not have been employed by a late-antique lawyer. Typ 1 should therefore be dated before the mid second century, he suggests, citing Max Kaser, Das Römische Privatrecht II, 141, 336.

His fifth argument is based on the diagram’s later evolution: If a more “advanced” scala (a left-right-mirrored version of Typ 5, the whole cognate family, extended to the 8th degree) was drawn in the Notitia Dignitatum (circa 400 CE), then a simpler version, the agnate-family Typ 1, must date from earlier, perhaps a lot earlier.

Schadt thus argues the diagram was treated as a scala (ladder) in antiquity, and that the Baumvorstellung notion for it did not arise until the 7th or 8th century (Darstellungen, p 59), and that the basic arbor juris diagram goes further than the late-antique period.

The four main manuscripts transmitting this "classical" Typ 1 scala, each with its own defects, are:
Paris, lat. 4410, fol. 3v, also often called the Stemma de Cujas (image on Mandragore):

Paris, lat. 4412, fol 75v-76r

Vatican, Reg. lat. 1023, 66v-67r (only online in black and white so far)

Leiden, BPL 114, fol 8r, (image on Socrates).


A mere glance at the five items above will make plain that none is definitive. The Tractatus has a version where cognate relatives are mentioned too, though this was not valid in early Roman law. The first column of the Stemma of Cujas (Cuiacus) has slipped lower by one row. Reg.lat.1023 is a dog's breakfast of graphic alterations and lat.4412 and BPL 114 are simply ill-assembled. The version in my missing manual is the sum of this design, eliminating the errors.

There are also said to be other manuscripts with similar figures in existence, as cited by Max Conrat, Geschichte, page 145, note 2 (Schadt does not discuss these), but I have not been able to confirm these exist, since none of them is, as far as I can see, yet accessible online. Those citations are of  an Epitome ab Aegidio Edita (Cod. Lugd. 169 = BPL 169 at Leiden, only 4 images digitized) and a breviary of law, Paris, BNF latin 4406, variously given as fols. 57, 58 or 68 (not digitized yet by Gallica that far through the book). Conrat's Lugd. 47, another breviary, listed as Lugd. Bat. 47 in Haenel, is probably VLQ 47 at Leiden, but only 8 images of this are offered on Socrates.

2017-03-16

Exposing the Peutinger Diagram

I recently announced a project to study how the late antique Peutinger Diagram was made. This reverse engineering project is comparable to lifting the hood/bonnet of a sleek car in the hope of understanding the mechanical principles by which it was built and operates.

The first step is to create a digital version of the Peutinger Diagram on which we can overlayer the findings as we accumulate them. My starting point is the digital projection of the Diagram created by Professor Richard J. A. Talbert’s team for the 2010 book Rome’s World: The Peutinger Map Reconsidered (Map A).

This projection is a panorama photograph after images of the 12th-century parchment pieces of the sole surviving copy had been stitched together digitally and slightly skewed so that everything matches up.

The result was a banana-shaped image that is not very practicable in full-screen view, so I have straightened the Talbert projection, inserting a single hinge about one third of the way from the left. The left and right tips of the panorama were raised a total of 2.85 degrees with respect to one another.
The pivot point is located at Cesena, Italy and roads and rivers in the vicinity have been adjusted accordingly but the slight shifts are in no way egregious, being well below the diagram's threshold of geographical accuracy.

The second step was to create a scalable vector graphic (SVG) file based on this projection. I began by merging a selection of SVG files which are stored online at the Ancient World Mapping Center in and employed in the Talbert Map Viewer and pivoted these in the same way. I soon found however that they are not very satisfactory from a SVG-design point of view, being full of transforms, unsuitable data objects, data cruft, broken lines and many tracing errors.

I have almost entirely retraced by hand the photographic image with a great many simplifications. This adaptation will provide us a compact, interactive, fast-loading data-file similar to that I have published for the Great Stemma. I have retained the Talbert colour coding system and some of his data objects. Acknowledgement to the Talbert team's work will appear on the new file.

The third step is to match this new data view of the Tabula with the past scholarship, whereby Konrad Miller's 1916 book, Itineraria Romana, is the great monument. Miller, a German citizen-scholar who died in 1933, analysed the diagram into its key routes, effectively recasting its data into list form. What I am now doing is mapping Miller's routes as an over-layer onto the SVG file.

The results will be uploaded as I go to the project page on ResearchGate. Keep visiting the project page to see the progress. Collaborators and followers are very welcome.

2017-02-01

The Tractatus Vaticanus

If the part of human cognition which you find most fascinating is visualization of ideas, you're bound to have asked yourself when humans began doing this. And you'll probably have heard of my research, which has found that the key advances, at least in the West, took place during classical or late antiquity.

So how do we know when (or if) the Roman world invented information visualizations? Apart from the special case of fasti (a full-year calendar), which Sarah Bond raised in debate in October 2016, no antique stone-carving or papyrus survives that contains any visualization of abstract concepts.

What we instead rely on is the medieval evidence which does not explicitly attribute the discovery to the Romans, but provides enough clues for us to deduce the periods of origin of certain visualizations. One of the really important cases is the arbor juris, a matrix of kinship that works a little bit like those old-fashioned distance tables showing kilometres separating principal cities of a country.

Nailing down a date when the Romans invented the arbor juris and discovering what they called it is enormously hard, and that's why the digitization this week of a Vatican legal codex is so important.

Vat. lat.1352 is an 11th-century legal codex often referred to as the Tractatus Vaticanus which scoops up certain unique passages of legal scholarship, making it a historical resource of major importance. As so often, the moot point is whether its unattributed excerpta on legal issues draw on late-antique sources, or come from textbooks of more recent (medieval) date.

In particular there has been debate about its arbor juris diagram at folio 62r (above). Could the diagram and parts of the text below it be copied from a late-antique or even classical textbook of law? Historians have worried away at this problem for years. Referring to the Vat. lat.1352 drawing, the historian of ideas Gerhart B. Ladner wrote (1979):
[Max] Conrat, too, for different reasons, derives this stemma from the Sententiae Pauli and assigns to it provenance and date in Spain between the sixth and eighth centuries ... (op.cit. pp. 37 ff). It is possible that diagrammatic stemmata were a part of the Brevarium and also of the Notititia Dignitatum from the beginning (note 102, page 267, Google).
This is a cautious interpretation. Hermann Schadt, the great German authority on the arbor juris, was convinced that late antique books like the (lost) original Notitia Dignitatum really did contain an arbor juris. He also assembled a set of arguments for a late antique - and even a possibly classical Roman origin of the arbor juris by another name.

Although the text below the diagram refers to it as an arbor (tree), its form looks nothing like a tree. In the eighth line, the text reads: Ita tibi scala erecta est, quae a patre ad avum ...deducit. Schadt argues that it is not by chance that scala (ladder) is used here, but that this is probably the earlier term for such a diagram. Law texts associated with the Justinian Code (from 529) also use the terms scala and gradus (rung).

What is more, the existence of this and similar diagrams and of a common term to describe them would bolster the evidence that information visualization existed in late antiquity, that it was widely understood as a technique and that people had a terminology to use it, teach it and improve it.

Here is a list of the first 300 out of 1,733 links to newly online digitizations of microfilm of the Vat.lat. series. Further lists will follow through the week.  
  1. Vat.lat.248 , LQ
  2. Vat.lat.334 , LQ
  3. Vat.lat.500.pt.1 , LQ
  4. Vat.lat.500.pt.2 , LQ
  5. Vat.lat.587.pt.1 , LQ
  6. Vat.lat.691 , LQ
  7. Vat.lat.717 , LQ
  8. Vat.lat.718 , LQ
  9. Vat.lat.829 , LQ
  10. Vat.lat.890 , LQ
  11. Vat.lat.970 , LQ
  12. Vat.lat.973 , LQ
  13. Vat.lat.989 , LQ
  14. Vat.lat.1012 , LQ
  15. Vat.lat.1033 , LQ
  16. Vat.lat.1042 , LQ
  17. Vat.lat.1044 , LQ
  18. Vat.lat.1048 , LQ
  19. Vat.lat.1054 , LQ
  20. Vat.lat.1055 , LQ
  21. Vat.lat.1056 , LQ
  22. Vat.lat.1066 , LQ
  23. Vat.lat.1071 , LQ
  24. Vat.lat.1076 , LQ
  25. Vat.lat.1083 , LQ
  26. Vat.lat.1085 , LQ
  27. Vat.lat.1110 , LQ
  28. Vat.lat.1116 , LQ
  29. Vat.lat.1118 , LQ
  30. Vat.lat.1134 , LQ
  31. Vat.lat.1140 , LQ
  32. Vat.lat.1171 , LQ
  33. Vat.lat.1187 , LQ
  34. Vat.lat.1190 , LQ, Beuron Number 201 
  35. Vat.lat.1191 , LQ
  36. Vat.lat.1192 , LQ
  37. Vat.lat.1195 , LQ, 
  38. Vat.lat.1217 , LQ
  39. Vat.lat.1242 , LQ
  40. Vat.lat.1258 , LQ
  41. Vat.lat.1261 , LQ
  42. Vat.lat.1265 , LQ
  43. Vat.lat.1266 , LQ
  44. Vat.lat.1268 , LQ
  45. Vat.lat.1271 , LQ
  46. Vat.lat.1288 , LQ, codex unicus of Pedro Gallego's translation of Aristotle, De Animalibus (HT to @LatinAristotle)
  47. Vat.lat.1294 , LQ
  48. Vat.lat.1297 , LQ
  49. Vat.lat.1308 , LQ
  50. Vat.lat.1311 , LQ
  51. Vat.lat.1321 , LQ
  52. Vat.lat.1322.pt.A , LQ,  the flyleaf is recorded as a piece of 6th century parchment inscribed in Latin: TM 66106 = Lowe, CLA 1 8; Italy, Venetia - Verona (?)
  53. Vat.lat.1328 , LQ
  54. Vat.lat.1340 , LQ
  55. Vat.lat.1341 , LQ, a very important church history compilation, the Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis, including details of the Second Council of Toledo
  56. Vat.lat.1343 , LQ
  57. Vat.lat.1345 , LQ, sole record of the 1120 Council of Nablus which established the crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. Only this one copy, located in a church in Sidon, seemed to survive the Muslim reconquest of the Kingdom. This was in the papal library at Avignon by 1330.
  58. Vat.lat.1348 , LQ
  59. Vat.lat.1349 , LQ, 11th century Collectio Canonum et Conciliorum in Beneventan script
  60. Vat.lat.1350 , LQ
  61. Vat.lat.1352 , LQ, the famous Tractatus Vaticanus, of unknown Italian origin (above)
  62. Vat.lat.1356 , LQ
  63. Vat.lat.1357 , LQ
  64. Vat.lat.1358 , LQ
  65. Vat.lat.1359 , LQ,
  66. Vat.lat.1360 , LQ, with a further arbor juris
  67. Vat.lat.1361 , LQ
  68. Vat.lat.1362 , LQ
  69. Vat.lat.1364 , LQ
  70. Vat.lat.1367 , LQ
  71. Vat.lat.1377 , LQ
  72. Vat.lat.1378 , LQ
  73. Vat.lat.1408 , LQ
  74. Vat.lat.1427 , LQ
  75. Vat.lat.1431 , LQ
  76. Vat.lat.1435 , LQ
  77. Vat.lat.1437 , LQ
  78. Vat.lat.1443 , LQ
  79. Vat.lat.1464 , LQ
  80. Vat.lat.1465 , LQ
  81. Vat.lat.1466 , LQ
  82. Vat.lat.1467 , LQ
  83. Vat.lat.1468 , LQ, 11th century Glossarium. See Lowe
  84. Vat.lat.1469 , LQ
  85. Vat.lat.1478 , LQ
  86. Vat.lat.1479 , LQ
  87. Vat.lat.1480 , LQ
  88. Vat.lat.1482 , LQ
  89. Vat.lat.1484 , LQ
  90. Vat.lat.1486 , LQ
  91. Vat.lat.1491 , LQ
  92. Vat.lat.1492 , LQ
  93. Vat.lat.1495 , LQ
  94. Vat.lat.1505 , LQ
  95. Vat.lat.1511 , LQ
  96. Vat.lat.1513 , LQ
  97. Vat.lat.1515 , LQ
  98. Vat.lat.1516 , LQ
  99. Vat.lat.1517 , LQ
  100. Vat.lat.1522 , LQ
  101. Vat.lat.1528 , LQ
  102. Vat.lat.1530 , LQ
  103. Vat.lat.1532 , LQ
  104. Vat.lat.1541 , LQ
  105. Vat.lat.1548 , LQ
  106. Vat.lat.1554 , LQ
  107. Vat.lat.1560 , LQ
  108. Vat.lat.1565 , LQ
  109. Vat.lat.1570 , LQ
  110. Vat.lat.1573 , LQ, Virgil, Bucolics, Georgics, Aeneid, 11th century Beneventan, according to Lowe
  111. Vat.lat.1574 , LQ
  112. Vat.lat.1575 , LQ
  113. Vat.lat.1577 , LQ
  114. Vat.lat.1580 , LQ
  115. Vat.lat.1586 , LQ
  116. Vat.lat.1589 , LQ
  117. Vat.lat.1590 , LQ
  118. Vat.lat.1593 , LQ
  119. Vat.lat.1594 , LQ
  120. Vat.lat.1595 , LQ
  121. Vat.lat.1597 , LQ
  122. Vat.lat.1598 , LQ
  123. Vat.lat.1608 , LQ
  124. Vat.lat.1610 , LQ
  125. Vat.lat.1611 , LQ
  126. Vat.lat.1621 , LQ
  127. Vat.lat.1628 , LQ
  128. Vat.lat.1631 , LQ
  129. Vat.lat.1650 , LQ
  130. Vat.lat.1653 , LQ
  131. Vat.lat.1660 , LQ
  132. Vat.lat.1661 , LQ
  133. Vat.lat.1662 , LQ
  134. Vat.lat.1663 , LQ
  135. Vat.lat.1664 , LQ
  136. Vat.lat.1669 , LQ
  137. Vat.lat.1671 , LQ
  138. Vat.lat.1673 , LQ
  139. Vat.lat.1675 , LQ
  140. Vat.lat.1678 , LQ
  141. Vat.lat.1679 , LQ
  142. Vat.lat.1694 , LQ
  143. Vat.lat.1703 , LQ
  144. Vat.lat.1706 , LQ
  145. Vat.lat.1707 , LQ
  146. Vat.lat.1720 , LQ
  147. Vat.lat.1746 , LQ
  148. Vat.lat.1762 , LQ
  149. Vat.lat.1773 , LQ
  150. Vat.lat.1775 , LQ
  151. Vat.lat.1778 , LQ
  152. Vat.lat.1783 , LQ
  153. Vat.lat.1785 , LQ
  154. Vat.lat.1787 , LQ
  155. Vat.lat.1788 , LQ
  156. Vat.lat.1790 , LQ
  157. Vat.lat.1792 , LQ
  158. Vat.lat.1795 , LQ
  159. Vat.lat.1798 , LQ
  160. Vat.lat.1802 , LQ
  161. Vat.lat.1806 , LQ
  162. Vat.lat.1812 , LQ
  163. Vat.lat.1816 , LQ
  164. Vat.lat.1837 , LQ
  165. Vat.lat.1861 , LQ
  166. Vat.lat.1869 , LQ
  167. Vat.lat.1870 , LQ
  168. Vat.lat.1875 , LQ
  169. Vat.lat.1877 , LQ
  170. Vat.lat.1880 , LQ
  171. Vat.lat.1881 , LQ
  172. Vat.lat.1887 , LQ
  173. Vat.lat.1890 , LQ
  174. Vat.lat.1893 , LQ
  175. Vat.lat.1897 , LQ
  176. Vat.lat.1904 , LQ
  177. Vat.lat.1917 , LQ
  178. Vat.lat.1932 , LQ
  179. Vat.lat.1935 , LQ
  180. Vat.lat.1936 , LQ
  181. Vat.lat.1937 , LQ
  182. Vat.lat.1938 , LQ
  183. Vat.lat.1939 , LQ
  184. Vat.lat.1940 , LQ
  185. Vat.lat.1943 , LQ
  186. Vat.lat.1945 , LQ
  187. Vat.lat.1946 , LQ
  188. Vat.lat.1974 , LQ
  189. Vat.lat.1976 , LQ
  190. Vat.lat.1984 , LQ
  191. Vat.lat.1992 , LQ
  192. Vat.lat.1994 , LQ
  193. Vat.lat.1998 , LQ
  194. Vat.lat.2000 , LQ
  195. Vat.lat.2005 , LQ
  196. Vat.lat.2010 , LQ
  197. Vat.lat.2014 , LQ
  198. Vat.lat.2027 , LQ
  199. Vat.lat.2028 , LQ
  200. Vat.lat.2030 , LQ
  201. Vat.lat.2034 , LQ
  202. Vat.lat.2044 , LQ, Lives of Jesus and the Popes, by Bartolomeo Platina (1474). Rome Reborn notes: Platina, librarian under Sixtus IV, compiled this set of sometimes quite critical biographies of the popes. This presentation copy of Platina's work contains corrections in his hand.
  203. Vat.lat.2048 , LQ
  204. Vat.lat.2050 , LQ
  205. Vat.lat.2052 , LQ
  206. Vat.lat.2066 , LQ
  207. Vat.lat.2071 , LQ
  208. Vat.lat.2072 , LQ
  209. Vat.lat.2074 , LQ
  210. Vat.lat.2075 , LQ
  211. Vat.lat.2078 , LQ
  212. Vat.lat.2085 , LQ, Metaphysica I of Aristotle, Latin translation (HT to @LatinAristotle)
  213. Vat.lat.2090 , LQ
  214. Vat.lat.2093 , LQ
  215. Vat.lat.2094 , LQ, the unique manuscript containing a Latin translation by Theodore of Gaza of the zoological work of Aristotle (HT to @LatinAristotle), Historia animalium. On the grand frontispiece at fol 1r, see John Murdoch, Album of Science, where he comments that this is typical of Renaissance naturalism. Rome Reborn offers the page in colour (below) and adds: The richly decorated title page centers on an imaginative depiction of Aristotle at work surrounded by animals and a naked human couple--perhaps Adam and Eve. The medallion below portrays Sixtus IV and is inscribed sacricultor (keeper of sacred things); the medal above shows the Ponte Sisto and alludes to Sixtus's building program and role as ruler of the city of Rome.
  216. Vat.lat.2115 , LQ
  217. Vat.lat.2118 , LQ
  218. Vat.lat.2121 , LQ
  219. Vat.lat.2122 , LQ
  220. Vat.lat.2123 , LQ
  221. Vat.lat.2124 , LQ
  222. Vat.lat.2132 , LQ
  223. Vat.lat.2135 , LQ
  224. Vat.lat.2136 , LQ
  225. Vat.lat.2138 , LQ
  226. Vat.lat.2139 , LQ
  227. Vat.lat.2145 , LQ
  228. Vat.lat.2146 , LQ
  229. Vat.lat.2148 , LQ
  230. Vat.lat.2153 , LQ
  231. Vat.lat.2154 , LQ
  232. Vat.lat.2159 , LQ, Blasius of Parma, Exposition and Quaestiones on Aristotle's Physics. John Murdoch, Album of Science, page 14, uses this as an example to explain the topic "Finding one's way around a medieval text", and reproduces folio 85r (frame 168) where the curly lines and pointing hands all make the arguments more tangible.
  233. Vat.lat.2162 , LQ
  234. Vat.lat.2163 , LQ
  235. Vat.lat.2167 , LQ
  236. Vat.lat.2185 , LQ
  237. Vat.lat.2186 , LQ
  238. Vat.lat.2190 , LQ
  239. Vat.lat.2191 , LQ
  240. Vat.lat.2214 , LQ
  241. Vat.lat.2215 , LQ
  242. Vat.lat.2222 , LQ
  243. Vat.lat.2274 , LQ
  244. Vat.lat.2280 , LQ
  245. Vat.lat.2290 , LQ
  246. Vat.lat.2306 , LQ
  247. Vat.lat.2307 , LQ
  248. Vat.lat.2317 , LQ
  249. Vat.lat.2324 , LQ
  250. Vat.lat.2343 , LQ
  251. Vat.lat.2366 , LQ
  252. Vat.lat.2369 , LQ
  253. Vat.lat.2375 , LQ
  254. Vat.lat.2378 , LQ
  255. Vat.lat.2380 , LQ
  256. Vat.lat.2381 , LQ
  257. Vat.lat.2384 , LQ
  258. Vat.lat.2388 , LQ
  259. Vat.lat.2396 , LQ
  260. Vat.lat.2416 , LQ
  261. Vat.lat.2418 , LQ
  262. Vat.lat.2426 , LQ
  263. Vat.lat.2427 , LQ
  264. Vat.lat.2434 , LQ
  265. Vat.lat.2463 , LQ
  266. Vat.lat.2482 , LQ
  267. Vat.lat.2484 , LQ
  268. Vat.lat.2486 , LQ
  269. Vat.lat.2494 , LQ
  270. Vat.lat.2509 , LQ
  271. Vat.lat.2533 , LQ
  272. Vat.lat.2539 , LQ
  273. Vat.lat.2548 , LQ
  274. Vat.lat.2569 , LQ
  275. Vat.lat.2580 , LQ
  276. Vat.lat.2593 , LQ
  277. Vat.lat.2625 , LQ
  278. Vat.lat.2639 , LQ, with an arbor juris
  279. Vat.lat.2641 , LQ
  280. Vat.lat.2648 , LQ
  281. Vat.lat.2658 , LQ
  282. Vat.lat.2659 , LQ
  283. Vat.lat.2660 , LQ
  284. Vat.lat.2666 , LQ
  285. Vat.lat.2687 , LQ
  286. Vat.lat.2691 , LQ
  287. Vat.lat.2693 , LQ
  288. Vat.lat.2694 , LQ
  289. Vat.lat.2710 , LQ
  290. Vat.lat.2712 , LQ
  291. Vat.lat.2713 , LQ
  292. Vat.lat.2714 , LQ
  293. Vat.lat.2726 , LQ
  294. Vat.lat.2727 , LQ
  295. Vat.lat.2731 , LQ
  296. Vat.lat.2740 , LQ
  297. Vat.lat.2742 , LQ
  298. Vat.lat.2759 , LQ
  299. Vat.lat.2781 , LQ
  300. Vat.lat.2782 , LQ
This is Piggin's Unofficial List number 98. If you have corrections or additions, please use the comments box below. Follow me on Twitter (@JBPiggin) for news of more additions to DigiVatLib.

Ladner, Gerhart B. ‘Medieval and Modern Understanding of Symbolism: A Comparison’. Speculum 54, no. 2 (1979): 223–56. Reprinted Rome, 1983 in: Ladner, Images and Ideas in the Middle Ages: Selected Studies in History and Art, vol 1 of 2. Ed. di Storia e Letteratura
Schadt, Hermann. Die Darstellungen der Arbores Consanguinitatis und der Arbores Affinitatis: Bildschemata in juristischen Handschriften. Tübingen [Germany]: Wasmuth, 1982.